🏛️ Issues and Advocacy Training
Courses › Battery Energy Storage Systems: How They Work, Fail and Burn

Lesson 8 of 9 · about 19 minutes

Codes, Standards and How Battery Fires Are Fought

You'll be able to

  • Name the main battery safety standards and what each one does, with current editions as of October 2026
  • Explain what Idaho's adopted 2018 IFC covers and where a county may need to require more
  • Describe defensive firefighting for battery fires and why departments often let a unit burn
  • Size an evacuation or shelter zone and estimate how many homes it reaches

Battery safety rules come in layers. A product standard says the equipment was built and tested a certain way. An installation standard says how it must be placed and protected. A fire code makes those enforceable in a jurisdiction. And a fire department's tactics decide what happens when all of that is not enough. A county that knows which layer is missing knows what to ask for.

The standards stack

DocumentWhat it doesStatus as of October 2026
UL 1973Safety standard for the batteries themselves in stationary useRequired for storage batteries by the 2018 IFC
UL 9540Safety standard used to list a complete energy storage systemRequired for prepackaged and pre-engineered systems by the 2018 IFC
UL 9540ATest method: how runaway starts and spreads cell to module to unit, and what gas comes out6th edition published March 13, 2026, formally adding large-scale fire testing
NFPA 855Installation standard for stationary storage: spacing, detection, suppression, explosion control, plans2026 edition, released September 2025; first edition was 2020
International Fire CodeThe enforceable code most U.S. jurisdictions adopt2021 and 2024 editions build NFPA 855 into Section 1207; Idaho enforces the 2018 edition statewide
NFPA 68 and NFPA 69Deflagration venting and explosion preventionReferenced through IFC Section 911 in newer editions

What changed in the 2026 NFPA 855

  • A hazard mitigation analysis is now the default for most installations unless a technology chapter says otherwise, and removing the old maximum stored energy table means exceeding a threshold no longer lets a project skip it.
  • Large-scale fire testing is required alongside UL 9540A, conducted or witnessed by an approved lab, to show whether a fire in one unit spreads to the next and to characterize the gas.
  • Where cell or module tests release flammable gas, a unit-level test with intentional ignition of vent gas.
  • Minimum requirements for an emergency response plan covering mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery, developed with the authority having jurisdiction, reviewed yearly, with yearly refresher training.
  • Early fire detection may use smoke, thermal imaging or radiant energy detection.

What the 2021 and later IFC require

The 2021 IFC, as shown in California's 2022 fire code built on it, requires outdoor storage to be at least 10 feet from lot lines, public ways, buildings, stored combustibles and other exposures, and defines remote outdoor installations as those more than 100 feet from such exposures. It requires explosion control under Section 911 for rooms and walk-in units unless large-scale testing shows flammable gas is not released, commissioning and decommissioning plans, and a hazard mitigation analysis in listed situations. New York's version of the 2024 code carries the same 10-foot and 100-foot lines and notes they are based on the 2023 NFPA 855.

Idaho's code, and its gaps

Idaho Code 41-253 adopts the International Fire Code, 2000 edition, "and such later editions as may be so published and adopted by the state fire marshal," as the statewide minimum. IDAPA 18.08.01 carries the State Fire Marshal's amendments. The State Fire Marshal's codes page lists the 2018 IFC as the adopted edition. This course found no later statewide adoption as of October 2026.

For batteries, that edition leaves real gaps.

  • Scope. The 2018 IFC's Section 1206.1 describes energy storage systems "designed to provide electrical power to a building or facility," such as standby power and load shedding. A standalone grid battery that exports to the grid does not fit that description neatly. How the code applies is the fire code official's call.
  • Utility exclusion. Section 1201.1 says Chapter 12 does not apply to generation, transmission and distribution equipment under the exclusive control of an electric utility. Whether a utility-owned battery at a substation falls in that exclusion is again a question for the fire code official, and worth asking about in writing.
  • Older numbers. The 2018 edition sets 5 feet of outdoor separation from lot lines, public ways and buildings (10 feet from means of egress), has no remote-installation category, and has no Section 911 explosion control requirement for batteries. It does require UL 9540 listing for prepackaged systems, an energy management system with alarms, and a hazard mitigation analysis in specific cases.

A county is not stuck with the minimum. Idaho Code 67-6512(d) lets a county attach conditions to a special use permit, including "requiring more restrictive standards than those generally required in an ordinance," and 67-6512(e) lets it require studies of a project's effects before granting the permit. Requiring compliance with the 2026 NFPA 855, a UL 9540A and large-scale fire test report for the exact product, and written fire district approval of the emergency response plan are common conditions. The fire and battery safety lesson in the energy siting course shows how to write them, and the conditional uses lesson covers the permit process.

States are moving too. California's SB 283, signed in October 2025 and effective January 1, 2026, requires developers to consult local fire authorities on design, risk and emergency plans before applying, and requires a fire safety inspection, paid by the owner, before a facility can operate.

How battery fires are fought

Battery fires flipped some old firefighting habits. UL FSRI's report on the 2019 Arizona explosion recommended hazmat training focused on storage systems, remotely accessible gas monitoring, explosion prevention and full-scale testing to find the safest tactics. Since then, the record in EPRI's database shows a fairly consistent playbook.

TacticWhat it meansWhere it was used
Monitor and contain, or let it burnKeep people back, let the affected unit burn out, watch for spreadMoss Landing 2025; Melba, Idaho 2023; Parkfield 2025; Peoria, Ariz. 2025
Cool the exposuresSpray water on neighboring units and structures, not into the burning onePeoria 2025 cooled adjacent Megapacks; Tilbury 2025 used a water curtain
Remote eyesDrones, robots and thermal cameras instead of people near the boxGateway 2024 used a drone and a robot; Tilbury used drones and thermal imaging
Read gas before entryMeasure hydrogen and other gases; keep doors shut until clearGateway's 600-foot barrier stayed while hydrogen was high
Draw down chargeLower state of charge across the site after an incidentWarwick, N.Y., Dec. 2025, cut SOC to 50%
Reignition watchStay or hand off to a site crew for days or weeksGateway, about 17 days; Moss Landing keeps a 24-hour private fire crew during cleanup (EPA)

Water is used to cool and to protect exposures, and sometimes, inside buildings, through sprinkler systems; Gateway's response pumped water into the building's suppression system, per EPRI's event page. Every gallon that touches burning batteries can carry contaminants, which lesson 9 covers.

Letting a unit burn is a trade. It keeps firefighters out of the blast zone, which is where people have been hurt and killed. It also means smoke for hours or days. Residents near Moss Landing and Melba lived through exactly that, and most neighbors mean that experience when they talk about battery risk.

Evacuation and shelter orders

IncidentOrder
Gateway, Otay Mesa, May 2024600-foot safety barrier; shelter order and evacuation warning
Escondido, Sept. 2024Evacuation within about a quarter mile; shelter in place farther east
Moss Landing cleanup fire, Sept. 2026Shelter in place within one-third mile, from the morning until about 4:15 p.m.
Chaumont, N.Y., July 2023Shelter in place within 1 mile
Parkfield, Aug. 2025Five homes within a 2-mile radius evacuated
Summerside, P.E.I., Sept. 2026Voluntary evacuation within 500 meters, shelter instructions, school closures

Worked example: who is inside the circle

An invented battery site near Juniper Gap sits in farm country with about 40 homes per square mile. Area of a circle = pi x radius squared; one square mile = 640 acres = 5,280 feet on a side.

Radius          Square miles               Homes at 40/sq mi
600 ft          pi x (600/5,280)^2 = 0.041   about 2
1/4 mile        pi x 0.25^2       = 0.196   about 8
1/3 mile        pi x 0.333^2      = 0.349   about 14
1 mile          pi x 1^2          = 3.14    about 126
2 miles         pi x 2^2          = 12.6    about 503

1/4 mile in acres: 0.196 x 640 = about 126 acres

Doubling the radius quadruples the area. A plan that names a 1-mile shelter zone has to reach about 16 times as many people as one that names a quarter mile. Ask which radius the emergency plan uses, why, and how each household inside it will be told.

Common mix-ups

  • Claim: Enough water puts out any battery fire. What the evidence shows: Departments mostly use water to cool neighbors and exposures; cells in runaway keep producing heat and gas.
  • Claim: Letting it burn means the fire department gave up. What the evidence shows: It is a deliberate tactic to keep responders away from explosion risk, recommended in investigations since 2019.
  • Claim: If the state fire code covers batteries, the county has nothing to add. What the evidence shows: Idaho's 2018 code predates NFPA 855's large-scale testing and remote-installation rules, and may not reach utility-controlled equipment. Counties can require more through permit conditions.

Reporting angle

  • Ask the fire code official, in writing, which code edition and sections apply to the project, whether any part falls under the utility exclusion in IFC 1201.1, and who signs off.
  • Request the UL 9540 listing, the UL 9540A and large-scale fire test reports, the hazard mitigation analysis and the emergency response plan from the county or fire district.
  • Ask the fire chief on the record: training received, by whom, at whose cost; water supply on site; equipment for gas monitoring; and the plan for evacuation radius and notification.
  • Watch the county planning and zoning commission and board agendas for the special use permit hearing; the Idaho Open-Meetings Compliance Tracker helps log notice and agenda compliance.
  • Check the State Fire Marshal's page and the administrative bulletin for any new IFC adoption.

Research angle

Check yourself

1. What is UL 9540A?

2. Which edition of the International Fire Code does Idaho's State Fire Marshal list as adopted statewide?

3. The 2018 IFC's Chapter 12 scope excludes which equipment?

4. Under the 2021 and later IFC (based on NFPA 855), outdoor energy storage must be at least how far from lot lines, public ways and buildings, and what counts as remote?

5. Why do fire departments often let a burning battery container burn out?

6. An evacuation zone has a radius of one-quarter mile. About how many acres does it cover?

Terms in this lesson

UL 9540
The safety standard used to list (certify) a complete energy storage system.
UL 9540A
The test method for thermal runaway fire propagation at cell, module, unit and installation level.
NFPA 855
The National Fire Protection Association's standard for installing stationary energy storage systems; 2026 edition released September 2025.
Authority having jurisdiction (AHJ)
The official or agency that enforces a code locally, usually the fire marshal or fire chief for fire code matters.
Hazard mitigation analysis (HMA)
An engineering analysis of how a system can fail and how the design limits the consequences; the default for most systems in the 2026 NFPA 855.
Defensive firefighting
Tactics that protect surrounding exposures and people from a safe distance instead of attacking the fire directly.

Full glossary

Sources