🎓 Journalism Training
Courses › How to Write an Article

Lesson 6 of 7 · about 15 minutes

Edit Your Own Copy

You'll be able to

  • Edit in separate passes instead of trying to fix everything at once
  • Verify every name, number, date and quote against your notes and documents
  • Spot and cut AI-sounding phrasing and stock structures
  • Vary sentence length on purpose and read the draft aloud

Your first draft is supposed to be bad. Its job is to exist. Editing is where it becomes an article, and most of the craft lives here.

Edit in passes. One read for facts, one for structure, one for sentences, one for phrasing. If you try to catch everything at once you will catch the typos and miss the wrong date.

Let the draft sit first if you can. An hour helps. Overnight helps more. You need to read what you wrote, not what you meant.

Pass one: facts

Print the draft or put it next to your notes. Go line by line. Every name, title, number, date, place and quote gets checked against a recording, a document or your notes. Put a small mark next to each one as you confirm it. Anything without a mark at the end gets checked or cut.

  • Spell every name against a source document or ask the person. "Ann," "Anne" and "Annie" are three different people to their mothers.
  • Recompute every percentage and per-capita figure. Do not trust the number you typed at 11 p.m.
  • Play the recording for every direct quote. Close enough is not a quote.
  • Check that each "according to" points at the right document.
  • Check days and dates together. If you wrote "Tuesday, March 12," make sure March 12 was a Tuesday.

The SPJ Code of Ethics tells journalists to take responsibility for the accuracy of their work and to verify before releasing it. This pass is how you do that.

Pass two: structure

Read only the first sentence of each paragraph. Does that sequence tell the story in the right order? If paragraph seven holds the second most important fact, move it up.

Check the lede against the point sentence you wrote before drafting. Then check the headline against the lede. Look for clumps of quotes or numbers. Check that the other side appears early enough that a fair reader would not think you forgot them. Look for the paragraph you love that does nothing. You know the one.

Pass three: sentences

Now read for clarity and rhythm. Cut every word that does not change the meaning. "In order to" becomes "to." "At this point in time" becomes "now." "Made the decision to" becomes "decided."

Prefer the short plain word. Use, not utilize. Help, not facilitate. Show, not demonstrate. Start, not commence.

Then fix rhythm. Prose where every sentence runs about the same length reads like a drone. Mix it up hard: a four-word sentence after a long one lands with weight. A long one after several short ones lets you carry detail.

Before and after: rhythm

Before (five sentences, each 16 to 18 words):

The board voted on the rate increase after more than two hours of public comment from residents. Most of the speakers opposed the increase and said they could not afford higher water bills. Several speakers said they were retired and lived on fixed incomes that do not rise with costs. The district manager said the increase is necessary to replace pipes that were installed in the 1960s. The board approved the increase by a vote of three to two near the end of the meeting.

After:

The vote came after two hours of public comment, nearly all of it against. Speaker after speaker said the same thing in different words: they were retired, their incomes were fixed, and their bills were not. Ruiz did not argue with any of them. She said the pipes were laid in the 1960s and they are going to fail whether the board votes or not. It passed 3 to 2.

Read the whole draft aloud. Every place you stumble, a reader will stumble. Every place you run out of breath, the sentence is too long or badly built.

Pass four: phrasing that sounds machine-made

A lot of writing now passes through AI tools at some stage, and even writing that never touched one has picked up the same habits from reading so much that did. Readers have learned the patterns. When they spot them, they assume nobody was paying attention, and they stop trusting the facts too. Wikipedia's editors keep a long public guide, "Signs of AI writing," because the habits are so recognizable. Whether a tool wrote it or you did, cut them.

Watch for these:

  • Puffed-up significance. This vote marks a pivotal moment for the community. The decision stands as a testament to the board's commitment. If the vote matters, the facts will show it. Say what changed.
  • Trailing importance clauses. The board approved the plan, highlighting the importance of infrastructure investment. The clause after the comma adds a claim no one made. Cut it.
  • The fake contrast. This isn't just about water. It's about the future of Marlow. Inflation by construction. Say the specific thing.
  • Habitual threes. The plan is bold, necessary and overdue. Three adjectives, none proved. One fact beats all three.
  • Vague attribution. Critics say the plan goes too far. Which critics? Name them, or cut the claim.
  • Signposts. Furthermore, Moreover, It's worth noting that, In conclusion. If the next sentence follows, it does not need a sign. If it does not follow, the sign will not help.
  • Filler nouns and verbs. landscape, ecosystem, tapestry, navigate, delve, foster, leverage, underscore. These words appear in a huge share of padded writing and almost never in a careful reporter's notes. Replace each one with the plain word you mean, or nothing.
  • The summary ending. In the end, one thing is certain: Marlow's water future will depend on the choices made today. Says nothing. End on a fact, a next step or a quote that earns it.
  • The same beat at the end of every section. A short dramatic line closing every block becomes a tic within three sections. Let some sections just stop.
  • Em dashes everywhere. They are a legitimate mark, but heavy use has become a tell. This course's house style bans them. Use commas, colons, parentheses or a new sentence.
The test for any sentence: could it appear, unchanged, in an article about a different town and a different issue? If yes, it is filler. Replace it with something only your reporting could produce.

The last look

After the four passes, do one fast read for typos, then check links: does each one open and go to the right page? Check that the headline, dek, lede and first number all agree. And check that you have contacted everyone your story makes a claim about, and given them a fair chance to respond.

Checklist

  • Every name spelled against a document or the person
  • Every number recomputed; percentages vs points checked
  • Every direct quote checked against the recording
  • Every document named in the text and linked to the original
  • Lede matches the point sentence; headline matches the lede
  • The other side appears early and in their own best words
  • No stock significance claims, trailing importance clauses or fake contrasts
  • No vague "critics say" or "experts say"
  • No signpost transitions or summary ending
  • Sentence lengths vary; draft read aloud once
  • Subjects of the story contacted for comment
  • All links open and go where they should

Try it

  1. Take a draft of 500 words or more. Yours, or have an AI tool write a short news story from the Marlow facts in lesson one.
  2. Do pass four only. Mark every offender from the list above. Count them.
  3. Rewrite each marked sentence with a specific fact or cut it. Note how many words the draft lost.
  4. Count the words in each sentence of one paragraph. If no sentence is under eight words and none is over 30, rewrite the paragraph to change that.
  5. Read the final version aloud, start to finish. Fix every place you stumble.
  6. Run your sources through Source Checker as part of the fact pass.

Current: In the News

Listed for reference, not as endorsements. Checked October 2026.

External resources

Check yourself

1. Why edit in separate passes?

2. What should come first in a self-edit?

3. Which sentence uses a stock phrase that reads as machine-made?

4. A paragraph has five sentences, each 18 to 22 words long. What is the likely problem?

5. What is the best way to catch clumsy sentences you have read too many times to see?

6. A sentence ends with ', which speaks to the importance of community engagement.' What should you usually do?

Terms in this lesson

Edit pass
One read of the draft looking for one kind of problem, such as facts, structure or wording.
Accuracy check
A line-by-line comparison of every fact in the draft against notes, recordings and documents.
Stock phrase
A ready-made phrase that could appear in any article on any topic, such as 'a pivotal moment.'
Sentence rhythm
The pattern of long and short sentences that makes prose easy or tiring to read.

Full glossary

Sources