🏛️ Issues and Advocacy Training
Courses › Elections and Campaign Finance Reports

Lesson 9 of 9 · about 18 minutes

Following the Money Into Ads, and Describing It Fairly

You'll be able to

  • Trace a political ad from its disclaimer to the report that shows who paid
  • Use station political files, expenditure schedules and independent expenditure reports together
  • Know which questions campaign finance records can and cannot answer
  • Apply a fairness check so a claim does not imply wrongdoing the evidence does not show

Every political ad leaves a paper trail, and it starts on the ad itself. The disclaimer names who paid. That name leads to a report, the report leads to donors and vendors, and the vendors lead back to the stations and platforms that ran the ad. Follow it one step at a time and you can show your neighbors who is paying to persuade them.

Step one: the disclaimer

The rules for what an ad must say are covered in depth in the Video and Radio Ad Development module, in its lesson Political and Issue Ad Rules. In short:

  • Idaho Code 67-6614A requires the person responsible for a political communication to be clearly indicated. In practice, "Paid for by" plus the committee's name.
  • Idaho Code 67-6628A lets a candidate sue over deceptive synthetic media (realistic but false AI-made audio or video of the candidate) in electioneering communications. A clear "This (video/audio) has been manipulated" disclosure is a defense.
  • For federal races, 52 U.S.C. 30120 requires a "paid for by" statement and, for candidate radio and TV ads, a statement by the candidate that the candidate approved the message.
  • Broadcasters must announce the sponsor under FCC rules and keep a political file.

Note the exact sponsor name from the ad. A committee called "Citizens for a Better Basin" might be registered as "Citizens for a Better Basin PAC" or "CBB Inc." Small differences matter when you search.

Step two: who is the sponsor?

Sponsor typeWhere its money shows up
Idaho candidate committeeIts monthly and 48-hour reports on the Sunshine portal
Idaho PAC or ballot measure committeeIts reports on the Sunshine portal, listing contributors over $50
Independent spender in an Idaho raceIndependent expenditure statements (67-6611) listing payees over $50; 48-hour reports for $1,000 or more in the last 16 days
Group running an electioneering communication67-6628 statements listing contributors of $50 or more to the filer
Federal candidateForm 3 on FEC.gov; payees on Schedule B
Super PAC or federal PACForm 3X; donors on Schedule A, ads on Schedule E, plus 24- and 48-hour reports
Nonprofit that does not report donorsIRS Form 990 for revenue, officers and grants; donors generally not public

Step three: match the ad to the spending

Campaigns rarely pay stations directly. They pay a media buyer or consultant, who pays the stations. So a report may show $40,000 to "Summit Strategies LLC, media" and nothing to any TV station. To connect the two:

  • Station political files. Broadcasters post records of requests to buy political time in their public files at publicfiles.fcc.gov. Look for the sponsor's name, flight dates and the buyer's name.
  • Independent expenditure reports. For federal races, a 24-hour report should appear within a day after an ad runs in the last 20 days, once spending reaches $1,000. For Idaho races, a 48-hour report is due for $1,000 or more after the 16th day before the election. If the ad is on the air and the report is not on file, ask why.
  • Platform ad libraries. The large online ad platforms publish political ad libraries with sponsor names and spending ranges. The Video and Radio Ad Development module notes their current rules as of October 2026.

Worked example: one mailer, three records

A glossy mailer opposing an invented library levy in the town of Aspen Draw says "Paid for by Taxpayers for Responsible Libraries." Mailers are not in station political files, so start with the committee.

  1. Sunshine portal: the committee's October report shows $14,200 in contributions: $10,000 from a single donor, the invented Plainsview Property Owners Association, and $4,200 from 31 individuals. (Idaho's contribution limits in 67-6610A apply to candidates, so a $10,000 gift to a ballot measure committee is not over any limit.)
  2. Same report, expenditures: $8,600 to an invented print shop, $3,150 to the U.S. Postal Service.
  3. Arithmetic: 10,000 / 14,200 = 70.4 percent from one donor. 8,600 + 3,150 = $11,750 spent on the mailer, or 11,750 / 14,200 = 82.7 percent of what the committee raised.
  4. Follow-up: the association is a nonprofit. Its Form 990 lists officers and total revenue, not donors. The next step is a call asking who decided to give $10,000 and why. They answer, or they decline.

A fair one-sentence summary, at a meeting or online: "Most of the money behind the mailers opposing the Aspen Draw library levy came from a single property owners' association, which gave $10,000 of the $14,200 the committee raised." Every word ties to a record.

Questions the records can answer

QuestionWhat you needWatch out for
Who is funding the raceTop donors for each candidate or side, computed the same wayTreating a donor list as a motive
Donors with business before the governmentContracts, permits, zoning or rate cases, with dates, matched to donorsImplying a trade. Show timing and let officials respond.
Out-of-state or out-of-district moneyShares with a named denominatorCalling legal money suspicious
Self-funding and loansCandidate contributions and loans, repayment termsEquating self-funding with wealth or virtue
Burn rate and cashSpending as a share of receipts, cash on hand, debtsPredicting the race from money alone
Outside spendingIndependent expenditures and electioneering statements versus candidate spendingAssuming coordination without evidence
ComplianceLate reports, missing 48-hour notices, apparent over-limit gifts, amendmentsTurning a small fixable error into a scandal
Where the money goesVendors, especially a candidate's own business or relativesForgetting that some payments to related parties are legal and reported

Keeping it fair

Campaign finance records are a gift to anyone following a race, and they are easy to misuse. A contribution is a fact. A motive is a guess. Most of the unfairness in claims about money comes from sliding from one to the other in a single verb.

Worked example: the comparison that changes the picture

An invented county commission race, two candidates.

Candidate ACandidate B
Money raised from others$38,000$29,500
From people in real estate and construction (identified through business records)$6,840$5,900
Share6,840 / 38,000 = 18.0%5,900 / 29,500 = 20.0%

"Candidate A took 18 percent of her money from developers" sounds damning. Next to Candidate B's 20 percent, it is a description of who gives in county races. The fair version gives both, with the same method, and says how donors were classified.

Checklist

  • Every number ties to a named report, period and filing date.
  • Shares name their denominator and use the same method for every candidate or side.
  • Verbs describe what the record shows: gave, received, spent, reported. Not "funneled," "bought" or "bankrolled" unless you can prove it.
  • Legal is labeled legal. Out-of-state gifts, bundling with each person's own money, and self-funding are all legal.
  • Apparent violations are called apparent until confirmed, and the campaign was asked.
  • Everyone named had a fair chance to respond, with enough time to actually do it.
  • Amended reports were checked.
  • Small private donors are named only when it matters to the point.
  • The symmetry test: would you make this claim, the same way, about the other side?

Common mix-ups

  • Claim: A donation followed by a favorable vote proves a deal. What the evidence shows: Donors usually give to candidates who already agree with them. Timing is worth noting; a trade requires evidence of an agreement.
  • Claim: The candidate who raises the most wins. What the evidence shows: Money helps, but well-funded candidates lose often enough that you should never call a race from a report.
  • Claim: No disclaimer means an illegal ad. What the evidence shows: Some communications are exempt or covered by different rules. Check the statute for that kind of communication before you call it illegal.

Reporting angle

  • Build a race file for each contest: every report for every candidate and committee, with filing dates, in one spreadsheet. The Article Values Graph can help you map which findings matter most before you write.
  • Collect ads as they appear: screenshots of mailers, recordings of radio and TV spots, links to online ads, each with the date seen and the disclaimer text.
  • Match ads to reports weekly in the last month. A visible ad with no matching report is a question to ask, not yet a story.
  • Request records such as public contracts and permit files for top donors with the Idaho FOIA / Public Records Letter Generator.

Research angle

Pictures, Numbers and Infographics

Idaho's 44 county clerks ran a 2024 general election in which more than three of every four registered voters returned a ballot. The pictures show how voting looked a century ago; the numbers cover turnout, contribution limits and the margins that set off a free recount.

A small wooden building used as a polling place in 1924, with a voting booth visible
A small election building and voting booth in Lanham, Maryland, on Election Day, November 4, 1924, from the National Photo Company. Idaho voters still mark paper ballots, and that paper is what a post-election audit or a recount goes back to. Credit: National Photo Company Collection, Library of Congress. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
A woman in a long coat and hat standing outdoors in 1918, photographed as a voter
A woman the caption card names as Marg. V. Lalley, photographed as a voter by the Bain News Service in March 1918. Idaho gave women the vote in 1896, decades before the 19th Amendment. Credit: Bain News Service, Library of Congress. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

By the numbers

Idaho general elections: voters and ballots 2020 registered 1,082,417 2020 ballots cast 878,527 (81.2%) 2024 registered 1,178,750 2024 ballots cast 917,469 (77.8%) Registered totals include election day registrations.
Registered voters and ballots cast in Idaho's last two presidential-year general elections, with turnout. Source: Idaho Secretary of State, 2024 county turnout and 2020 voting statistics.
Most one donor may give a candidate, per election Idaho local or legislative $1,000 Federal candidate $3,500 Idaho statewide office $5,000 Federal, multicandidate PAC $5,000 Primary and general are separate elections.
Contribution limits to a single candidate for each election. Source: Idaho Code 67-6610A and FEC, 2025-2026 limits.

Check yourself

1. An Idaho ad says 'Paid for by Valley Voters United.' Where do you look first to see who funds that committee?

2. Where can the public view broadcast stations' political files online?

3. A candidate's report shows $40,000 paid to a consulting firm and nothing paid to TV stations, yet the candidate's TV ads are everywhere. What is the likely explanation?

4. Candidate A got 18 percent of her money from real estate interests. Before repeating that, what comparison makes the number fair?

5. Which wording stays within what a contribution record shows?

6. When does it make sense to leave a small donor's name out when you talk about a campaign's money in public?

Terms in this lesson

Disclaimer
The 'paid for by' statement on a political ad that identifies who paid; required by Idaho, federal and FCC rules in different forms.
Political file
The part of a broadcaster's public inspection file that records requests to buy political ad time; posted online by the FCC.
Media buyer
A firm that buys ad time or space for a campaign and pays the outlets, so the campaign report shows the firm, not the stations.
Quid pro quo
An exchange of something of value for an official act; a contribution alone is not evidence of one.
Base rate
How common something is in general, which you need before calling any one case unusual.

Full glossary

Sources