🏛️ Issues and Advocacy Training
Courses › How the Power Grid Works

Lesson 6 of 8 · about 16 minutes

Who Regulates the Grid

You'll be able to

  • Assign a given grid decision to FERC, NERC, a state commission or a local board
  • Explain the revenue requirement formula behind a rate case
  • Follow the steps of a rate case and know where the public can take part

Three layers of regulators touch every kilowatt-hour, and each one has a fence around what it can decide. People lose hours calling the wrong agency. The fastest test: ask whether the question is about wholesale and high-voltage (federal), reliability rules for the bulk grid (NERC), or what a retail customer pays and how the local utility behaves (state or local).

The layers

FERC (federal) Wholesale power sales, interstate transmission rates and access, market rules, hydro licenses NERC + six regional entities (WECC in the West) Mandatory reliability standards for the bulk power system; FERC approves them State PUCs (IOUs) / city councils / co-op boards Retail rates, resource plans, new power plants, service quality, distribution
Who decides what. The bottom layer is where most local fights happen.

FERC

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is an independent agency of five commissioners. It regulates the transmission and wholesale sale of electricity in interstate commerce, approves the tariffs that run markets like the WEIM, EDAM and Markets+, licenses non-federal hydro dams, approves NERC's reliability standards and polices market manipulation. Its 2024 Order No. 1920 requires transmission providers to plan regionally at least 20 years out.

FERC's own page is blunt about what it does not do: it does not regulate retail electricity sales to consumers, approve construction of power plants, or regulate municipal utilities, federal power marketing agencies and most rural co-ops. A customer angry about their bill almost never has a FERC problem.

NERC and WECC

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation is a nonprofit that FERC certified as the Electric Reliability Organization after the Energy Policy Act of 2005 made reliability standards mandatory. NERC writes standards on things like cold-weather preparation, vegetation near transmission lines and cybersecurity. FERC approves them. NERC and six regional entities audit utilities and can levy fines. In the West, the regional entity is WECC. NERC also publishes the seasonal and long-term reliability assessments covered in lesson 8.

State commissions

The Idaho Public Utilities Commission has three commissioners appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate, with no more than two from the same party, serving staggered six-year terms. It regulates investor-owned utilities such as Idaho Power, Avista, Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp) and Intermountain Gas. It does not regulate co-ops or city utilities. Its staff, a team of engineers, accountants and attorneys, is a party in every case and often the most informed skeptic in the room.

DecisionWho decides (for an Idaho IOU)
Residential rate per kWhIdaho PUC
Price a utility pays for wholesale power from another stateNegotiated, under FERC rules
Whether a new gas plant is prudent and can go in ratesIdaho PUC
Cold-weather standards for generatorsNERC, approved by FERC
Cost to move power on an interstate transmission lineFERC (open access transmission tariff)
A city utility's ratesCity council or utility board
Joining EDAM or Markets+The utility decides, with FERC approving tariffs and state commissions reviewing the costs

How a rate case works

A regulated utility gets a deal: a monopoly on its territory in exchange for letting the state set its prices. The price is supposed to cover reasonable costs plus a fair return for investors, no more. A rate case is how the commission works out that number.

The formula

Revenue requirement = Operating expenses
                    + Depreciation
                    + Taxes
                    + (Rate base x Rate of return)

Rate base is the net value of plants, lines and equipment serving customers. The rate of return blends the interest rate on the utility's debt with an allowed return on equity for shareholders. Because profit comes from rate base, an investor-owned utility earns more by building more, which is why regulators test whether each investment was prudent and "used and useful." That incentive is built into the system on purpose, and anyone weighing in on a rate case should understand it first.

Example: a simplified revenue requirement

Invented Basin River Electric files a case.

Operating expenses (fuel, payroll, maintenance):  $420 million
Depreciation:                                    $110 million
Taxes:                                            $45 million
Rate base:                                     $3,000 million
Rate of return (blended debt and equity):           7.2%

Return = $3,000M x 0.072 = $216 million
Revenue requirement = 420 + 110 + 45 + 216 = $791 million

Current rates bring in $730 million.
Requested increase: 791 - 730 = $61 million, or 61 / 730 = 8.4%

Now watch the fights. Staff argues return on equity should be lower, cutting the rate of return to 7.0 percent: 3,000 x 0.070 = $210 million, saving $6 million. An industrial group argues $150 million of a new substation is not yet used and useful and should come out of rate base: 150 x 0.072 = $10.8 million less return, plus that asset's depreciation. Each adjustment is small. Stack a dozen and the request shrinks fast, which is what usually happens.

The steps

  1. Filing. The utility files an application, testimony from its experts and proposed new tariffs. Idaho Code 61-307 requires 30 days' notice to the commission and public before rates change, unless the commission allows otherwise for good cause.
  2. Suspension and notice. The commission usually suspends the proposed rates while it reviews them. Under Idaho Code 61-622 the initial suspension is up to 30 days, extendable by up to five months, plus 60 more days for good cause. It issues a notice of application with deadlines.
  3. Intervention. Groups such as large industrial customers, irrigators, consumer advocates and environmental groups petition to become intervenors.
  4. Discovery. Parties send written questions (production requests) and the utility must answer. The answers are often the richest public record in the case.
  5. Testimony. Staff and intervenors file their own expert testimony proposing different numbers.
  6. Settlement or hearing. Many cases settle, with some or all parties agreeing to a number. The commission still has to approve it and can reject it.
  7. Public comment and hearings. Customers can file written comments and speak at public hearings. These are part of the record.
  8. Final order. The commission issues a written order with its reasons. Parties can ask for reconsideration and then appeal.

Real case: Idaho Power, IPC-E-25-16

Idaho Power asked the Idaho PUC in 2025 for a $199.1 million increase. The commission approved a settlement for $110 million a year, a 7.48 percent overall increase, effective January 1, 2026. It estimated a residential customer using 900 kWh a month would pay about $12.13 more per month and kept the residential service charge at $15.00. The company got about 55 percent of what it asked for (110 / 199.1 = 0.55), a common kind of outcome.

Common mix-ups

  • Claim: "The commission rubber-stamps whatever the utility wants." What the evidence shows: Outcomes vary, but approved increases are often well below the request, as in IPC-E-25-16. The fair test for any one case is to compare the request, the staff position and the final order line by line.
  • Claim: "Utility profits are whatever they can squeeze out." What the evidence shows: Investor-owned utility returns are set as an allowed return on equity in rate cases. Utilities can over- or under-earn between cases, and the earnings reports filed with commissions show which.

Reporting angle: reading a rate case docket

  • Every Idaho PUC case has a number like IPC-E-25-16: utility code, industry (E for electric), year, sequence. Search the commission's case files by that number.
  • Read in this order: the notice of application (plain-language summary and deadlines), the utility's application, staff's comments or testimony, any settlement, then the final order.
  • Find the requested return on equity and the approved one. Find the biggest disputed rate base items. Those are your story.
  • Read the production requests and responses. Questions from staff often point straight at the weakest part of the utility's case.
  • Read public comments. They are public records and can lead you to customers with specific stories.
  • Note the comment deadline and hearing dates and publish them early, so readers can take part.

Research angle

Check yourself

1. Which agency regulates retail electricity rates for an investor-owned utility in Idaho?

2. What does NERC do?

3. In the revenue requirement formula, what is 'rate base'?

4. In Idaho Power's 2025 general rate case (IPC-E-25-16), the company asked for $199.1 million. What did the commission approve?

5. Under Idaho law, how long can the commission suspend a proposed rate schedule while it reviews it?

Terms in this lesson

FERC
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which regulates interstate transmission and wholesale electricity sales.
NERC
The North American Electric Reliability Corporation, the federally certified body that writes and enforces reliability standards for the bulk grid.
Public utility commission (PUC)
The state agency that sets retail rates and service rules for investor-owned utilities.
Rate case
A formal proceeding in which a utility asks regulators to change its rates and must justify the costs.
Revenue requirement
The total money a utility is allowed to collect in a year: operating costs plus depreciation, taxes and a return on rate base.
Intervenor
A party formally admitted to a regulatory case, with the right to file testimony, ask questions and sign or oppose settlements.

Full glossary

Sources