🏛️ Issues and Advocacy Training
Courses › How Laws and Rules Get Made

Lesson 9 of 9 · about 16 minutes

Giving testimony and comments that count

You'll be able to

  • Know how to register to testify before an Idaho legislative committee, in person, remotely or in writing
  • Recognize the structure of effective two-to-three-minute testimony: one ask, one fact and one story
  • Know what makes an agency rule comment useful: it addresses the agency's own questions and offers an alternative
  • Name the right moment in each process to weigh in

Most testimony is forgettable for one reason: it tries to say everything. A committee that hears forty people in two hours remembers the person who asked for one thing, backed it with one fact nobody else had, and sat down early. That person usually spent about an hour preparing and had the discipline to leave a favorite paragraph out.

Pick the right door at the right time

Every process in this module has a moment when input is cheap and a moment when it is nearly useless. Show up at the cheap one.

ProcessBest momentWhere to weigh inToo late
Idaho billBefore the committee hearing, then at itCommittee agenda, testimony registration, email to membersAfter the committee votes do-pass; floor debate has no public testimony
Idaho agency ruleNegotiated rulemakingTownhall Idaho meetings, the agency contact named in the notice of intentAfter the pending rule publishes; then only the germane legislative committee is left
Federal ruleComment period on the proposed ruleThe docket on regulations.govAfter the final rule; then only petitions, Congress or litigation
City or county ordinanceBefore first reading, then at a public hearingStaff, the agenda packet, public comment timeAfter the readings are suspended and the vote is taken

Testifying before an Idaho legislative committee

The Legislature's testimony page lays out the rules. All committee action on bills and administrative rules happens in open session, and public testimony is allowed at most committee meetings. The chair decides when an item is heard.

  • Register: use the testimony registration link on the committee agenda or the committee's page. Have ready your name, email and physical address, any organization you represent, whether you will testify in person or remotely, and whether you are for or against.
  • Privacy: the page says what you submit may be public, except your email and physical address.
  • Remote: remote testimony must be registered, and if you will call in, include the phone number you will use. The chair will try to give remote and in-person testifiers the same time, and remote testimony gets the same weight.
  • Written: written testimony is not required, but you can send it to the committee secretary, whose email is on the committee page. For remote testifiers the Legislature recommends sending it at registration in case of technical problems.
  • No guarantee: registering does not guarantee a turn if the chair limits testimony. Meetings get delayed or rescheduled.
  • Conduct: demonstrations, applause, clapping and signs are prohibited. Breaking the chair's rules forfeits your chance to testify.
  • Access: ASL interpreters are available with 24 hours' notice through the Legislative Information Center, and all streams are closed captioned.

A structure that works

Committee chairs often limit each speaker to a few minutes, usually two to three. At a comfortable speaking pace that is roughly 250 to 400 words, so testimony around 300 words fits with room to spare.

  1. Who you are, in one sentence. Name, town, and why your perspective is relevant. "I run a 40-cow dairy" beats "I'm a concerned citizen."
  2. Your ask, in one sentence. Support, oppose, or amend a specific section. Name the bill number.
  3. One fact they don't have. A number from your own books, a record you obtained, a result from another state.
  4. One short story. What happens to a real person, maybe you, if the bill passes or fails.
  5. Repeat the ask and stop. Thank the chair. Offer to answer questions.

Before and after

Before (about 90 seconds of a 3-minute slot, and still warming up):

Thank you so much for having me today. I just want to say that I have lived here for a long time and I care deeply about our community and our values. This bill raises questions about fairness, and I think we all need to really think hard about what kind of state we want to be. A growing number of people I talk to are worried about it...

After (the whole thing, about 180 words; the speaker, town and bill are invented, so do not look up the bill number):

Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, I'm Dana Ostrander from the invented town of Fenwick. I manage the Fenwick Rural Water Association, which serves 412 households.

I'm asking you to amend Section 2 of House Bill 812 to extend the compliance deadline from 12 months to 24 months.

Here's why. The bill requires a new backflow device on every connection. Our supplier quoted $310 per device installed. For 412 connections that's $127,720. Our annual budget is $96,000, so the bill asks us to spend 133 percent of a year's budget in 12 months. The low-interest loan we would apply for takes about 18 months from application to money.

Last spring one of our members, a widow on a fixed income, asked me whether she should sell her house if rates go up again. I didn't have a good answer.

We support the bill's goal. A 24-month deadline lets us finance it with that loan instead of through her.

Again, please amend Section 2 to 24 months. I'm happy to send the supplier quote to the committee secretary. Thank you.

The math checks: 412 x $310 = $127,720, and $127,720 / $96,000 = 1.33. The ask is in the second sentence and the last.

Commenting on an agency rule

Rule comments work differently. They go to staff who must read, summarize and respond to every comment, so the useful ones are easy to use. In Idaho, the proposed rule notice names the person who receives comments and the deadline, and the comment period is at least 21 days (Idaho Code 67-5222). Federal comments go to the docket on regulations.gov.

The guide "Tips for Submitting Effective Comments," published for regulations.gov users, is the best one-page manual there is. Its main points, condensed:

  • Read the proposal, and address the questions the agency itself asks.
  • Identify the exact provision you are discussing, by section or page.
  • Explain your reasoning, because "the comment process is not a vote."
  • Support your points with data, facts, expert opinion or your own experience, and give examples of how the rule would affect you.
  • If you oppose a provision, propose an alternative that meets the same goal, including no regulation.
  • Keep a copy of what you submit.

The guide also notes there is no minimum or maximum length, and that one well-supported comment can carry more weight than many form letters. Form letters still matter politically, since they show how many people care. They rarely change the text of a rule.

In Idaho, remember the extra lever: if 25 people, a city, a county or another agency ask in writing within the deadline, the agency must hold an oral presentation on a substantive rule (67-5222(2)). Since July 1, 2026, agencies must post recordings of those presentations and rule hearings within 15 days.

Speaking at a city or county meeting

Local bodies usually offer two kinds of speaking time: a general public comment period, often limited to items not on the agenda, and formal public hearings on specific items like land use decisions or fee increases. Check the agenda and the body's rules for which applies, the time limit and whether you must sign up in advance. The same structure works: who you are, the ask, one fact, one story, the ask again. A written copy left with the clerk goes into the record exactly as the speaker meant it.

Common mix-ups

  • Claim: The side with more comments wins. What the evidence shows: Agencies must consider the substance of comments. The regulations.gov guide says the process is not a vote.
  • Claim: Remote testimony counts less. What the evidence shows: The Idaho Legislature says remote testimony gets the same weight as in-person testimony.
  • Claim: You can speak during floor debate in the Idaho House or Senate. What the evidence shows: Public testimony happens in committee. Floor debate is for members.

Reporting angle

  • Committee minutes list who testified and on which side. Count them, and compare with how members voted.
  • Read written testimony submitted to the committee secretary. It is often more detailed than what was said aloud.
  • On federal dockets, separate form letters from unique comments before you report a total, and say which you counted.
  • Ask agencies for their response-to-comments document. It shows which arguments changed the rule.

Research angle

Checklist

  • The deadline and the right place to submit are known.
  • The ask comes in the first three sentences and again in the last.
  • There is one fact the decision makers probably don't have, with its source.
  • The exact bill, section or rule provision is named.
  • The speaker or commenter kept a copy.

Pictures, Numbers and Infographics

Idaho bills, agency rules and federal actions each move on fixed schedules with fixed vote counts. The numbers below come from the 2025 and 2026 records: a real bill's dated history, the state rule count, and how often Congress and the president used their fastest tools.

Old postcard view of the domed Idaho State Capitol in Boise with trees and lawn in front
The Idaho State Capitol in Boise on a postcard from about 1930. The Legislature's history says the central portion was finished in 1912 and the east and west wings, where the House and Senate meet, in 1920. All 105 members and nearly all of the bill hearings in this module work out of this building. Credit: Unknown photographer, Alaska, Western Canada and United States Collection. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

By the numbers

One bill's path: House Bill 500, 2026 Jan. 20 Introduced in the House and sent for printing. Feb. 5 House Transportation and Defense Committee: do pass. Feb. 9 House third reading: passed 68-0-2. Feb. 24 Senate Transportation Committee: do pass. March 10 Senate third reading: passed 34-0-1. March 13 Enrolled bill delivered to the governor. March 16 Signed by Gov. Little. Session Law Chapter 24.
The dated history of one 2026 bill that passed both chambers without amendment. Source: Idaho Legislature, House Bill 500 (2026).
Congressional Review Act resolutions enacted G.W. Bush 1 Trump, 2017-21 16 Biden 3 Trump, 2025 22 42 enacted from 1996 through Dec. 11, 2025.
Disapproval resolutions under the Congressional Review Act signed into law, by president. Source: Ballotpedia News, Dec. 19, 2025.

Check yourself

1. When you register to testify before an Idaho legislative committee, which information does the registration page say is not made public?

2. Does registering guarantee you a chance to speak at an Idaho legislative committee hearing?

3. What makes a public comment on a proposed rule most likely to influence the agency?

4. At what stage is it usually cheapest to change an Idaho agency rule?

5. Which behavior can cost you your chance to testify in an Idaho legislative committee?

6. You want to testify on a bill before House Transportation and Defense. What is the first practical step?

Terms in this lesson

Testimony
A statement given to a committee or hearing body, spoken or written, that becomes part of the public record.
Public comment
Written or oral input submitted during an agency's comment period or a local government's public comment time.
The ask
The single specific action you want the decision makers to take, such as hold the bill, amend section 3 or adopt the rule as written.
Form letter
Identical comments submitted by many people. Agencies often group them and treat them as one comment.
Germane committee
The committee whose subject area covers a bill or rule. It is the body that hears testimony on it.

Full glossary

Sources